Infective endocarditis (IE) is defined as an infection of the endocardial surface of the heart, which may include one or more heart valves, the mural endocardium, or a septal defect. Its intracardiac effects include severe valvular insufficiency, which may lead to intractable congestive heart failure and myocardial abscesses. IE also produces a wide variety of systemic signs and symptoms through several mechanisms, including both sterile and infected emboli and various immunological phenomena.[1, 2, 3]
The history of IE can be divided into several eras. Lazaire Riviere first described gross autopsy findings of the disease in 1723. In 1885, William Osler presented the first comprehensive description of endocarditis in English. Lerner and Weinstein presented a thorough discussion of this disease in modern times in their landmark series of articles, "Infective Endocarditis in the Antibiotic Era," published in 1966 in the New England Journal of Medicine.[4, 5, 6]
IE currently can be described as infective endocarditis in the era of intravascular devices, as infection of intravascular lines has been determined to be the primary risk factor for Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections (BSIs). S aureus has become the primary pathogen of endocarditis.[7]
IE generally occurs as a consequence of nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis, which results from turbulence or trauma to the endothelial surface of the heart. A transient bacteremia then seeds the sterile platelet/fibrin thrombus, with IE as the end result. Pathologic effects due to infection can include local tissue destruction and embolic phenomena. In addition, secondary autoimmune effects, such as immune complex glomerulonephritis and vasculitis, can occur. (See Pathophysiology.)
IE remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Its manifestations may be muted by the indiscriminate use of antimicrobial agents or by underlying conditions in frail and elderly individuals or immunosuppressed persons. (See Diagnosis.)
Effective therapy has become progressively more difficult to achieve because of the proliferation of implanted biomechanical devices and the rise in the number of resistant organisms. Antibiotic prophylaxis has probably had little effect in decreasing the incidence of IE. (See Treatment and Management.)
For other discussions on IE, see Pediatric Bacterial Endocarditis, Infectious Endocarditis, Neurological Sequelae of Infective Endocarditis, and Antibiotic Prophylactic Regimens for Endocarditis.
Types of infective endocarditis
Endocarditis has evolved into several variations, keeping it near the top of the list of diseases that must not be misdiagnosed or overlooked. Endocarditis can be broken down into the following categories:
- Native valve endocarditis (NVE), acute and subacute
- Prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE),[8] early and late
- Intravenous drug abuse (IVDA) endocarditis
Other terms commonly used to classify types of IE include pacemaker IE and nosocomial IE (NIE).
The classic clinical presentation and clinical course of IE has been characterized as either acute or subacute. Indiscriminate antibiotic usage and an increase in immunosuppressed patients have blurred the distinction between these 2 major types; however, the classification still has clinical merit.[9]
Acute NVE frequently involves normal valves and usually has an aggressive course. It is a rapidly progressive illness in persons who are healthy or debilitated. Virulent organisms, such as S aureus and group B streptococci, are typically the causative agents of this type of endocarditis. Underlying structural valve disease may not be present.
Subacute NVE typically affects only abnormal valves. Its course, even in untreated patients, is usually more indolent than that of the acute form and may extend over many months. Alpha-hemolytic streptococci or enterococci, usually in the setting of underlying structural valve disease, typically are the causative agents of this type of endocarditis.
PVE accounts for 10-20% of cases of IE. Eventually, 5% of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves become infected. Mechanical valves are more likely to be infected within the first 3 months of implantation, and, after 1 year, bioprosthetic valves are more likely to be infected. The valves in the mitral valve position are more susceptible than those in the aortic areas.[8]
Early PVE occurs within 60 days of valve implantation. Traditionally, coagulase-negative staphylococci, gram-negative bacilli, and Candida species have been the common infecting organisms. Late PVE occurs 60 days or more after valve implantation. Staphylococci, alpha-hemolytic streptococci, and enterococci are the common causative organisms. Recent data suggest that S aureus may now be the most common infecting organism in both early and late PVE.[10]
In 75% of cases of IVDA IE, no underlying valvular abnormalities are noted, and 50% of these infections involve the tricuspid valve.[11] S aureus is the most common causative organism.
Analogous to PVE are infections of implantable pacemakers and cardioverter-defibrillators. Usually, these devices are infected within a few months of implantation. Infection of pacemakers includes that of the generator pocket (the most common), infection of the proximal leads, and infection of the portions of the leads in direct contact with the endocardium.
This last category represents true pacemaker IE, is the least common infectious complication of pacemakers (0.5% of implanted pacemakers), and is the most challenging to treat. Of pacemaker infections, 75% are produced by staphylococci, both coagulase-negative and coagulase-positive.
NIE is defined as an infection that manifests 48 hours after the patient is hospitalized or that is associated with a hospital, based on a procedure performed within 4 weeks of clinical disease onset. The term healthcare-associated infective endocarditis (HCIE) is preferable to NIE, since it is inclusive of all sites that deliver patient care, such as hemodialysis centers. The term NIE should be applied to cases of IE acquired in the hospital. An appropriate alternative term would be iatrogenic IE.
Two types of NIE have been described. The right-sided variety affects a valve that has been injured by placement of an intravascular line (eg, Swan-Ganz catheter). Subsequently, the valve is infected by a nosocomial bacteremia. The second type develops in a previously damaged valve and is more likely to occur on the left side. S aureus has been the predominant pathogen of NIE/HCIE since the recent prevalence of intravascular devices. Enterococci are second most commonly isolated pathogens. These usually arise from a genitourinary source.
Evolution of clinical characteristics of infective endocarditis
Since the 1960s, the clinical characteristics of IE have changed significantly. The dramatic "graying" of the disease and the increase in recreational drug use and proliferation of invasive vascular procedures underlie this phenomenon. Varieties of IE that were uncommon in the early antibiotic era have become prominent. Cases of NIE, IVDA IE, and PVE have markedly increased. Valvular infections have entered the era of IE caused by intravascular devices and procedures.
The underlying valvular pathology has also changed. Rheumatic heart disease currently accounts for less than 20% of cases, and 6% of patients with rheumatic heart disease eventually develop IE. Approximately 50% of elderly patients have calcific aortic stenosis as the underlying pathology. Congenital heart disease accounts for 15% of cases, with the bicuspid aortic valve being the most common example.
Other contributing congenital abnormalities include ventricular septal defects, patent ductus arteriosus, and tetralogy of Fallot. Atrial septal defect (secundum variety) is rarely associated with IE. Mitral valve prolapse is the most common predisposing condition found in young adults and is the predisposing condition in 30% of cases of NVE in this age group. IE complicates 5% of cases of asymmetrical septal hypertrophy, usually involving the mitral valve.
Pathophysiology
IE develops most commonly on the mitral valve, closely followed in descending order of frequency by the aortic valve, the combined mitral and aortic valve, the tricuspid valve, and, rarely, the pulmonic valve. Mechanical prosthetic and bioprosthetic valves exhibit equal rates of infection.
All cases of IE develop from a commonly shared process, as follows:
- Bacteremia (nosocomial or spontaneous) that delivers the organisms to the surface of the valve
- Adherence of the organisms
- Eventual invasion of the valvular leaflets
The common denominator for adherence and invasion is nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis, a sterile fibrin-platelet vegetation. The development of subacute IE depends on a bacterial inoculum sufficient to allow invasion of the preexistent thrombus. This critical mass is the result of bacterial clumping produced by agglutinating antibodies.
In acute IE, the thrombus may be produced by the invading organism (ie, S aureus) or by valvular trauma from intravenous catheters or pacing wires (ie, NIE/HCIE). S aureus can invade the endothelial cells (endotheliosis) and increase the expression of adhesion molecules and of procoagulant activity on the cellular surface. Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis may result from stress, renal failure, malnutrition, systemic lupus erythematosus, or neoplasia.
The Venturi effect also contributes to the development and location of nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis. This principle explains why bacteria and the fibrin-platelet thrombus are deposited on the sides of the low-pressure sink that lies just beyond a narrowing or stenosis.
In patients with mitral insufficiency, bacteria and the fibrin-platelet thrombus are located on the atrial surface of the valve. In patients with aortic insufficiency, they are located on the ventricular side. In these examples, the atria and ventricles are the low-pressure sinks. In the case of a ventricular septal defect, the low-pressure sink is the right ventricle and the thrombus is found on the right side of the defect.
Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis may also form on the endocardium of the right ventricle, opposite the orifice that has been damaged by the jet of blood flowing through the defect (ie, the MacCallum patch).
The microorganisms that most commonly produce endocarditis (ie, S aureus; Streptococcus viridans; group A, C, and G streptococci; enterococci) resist the bactericidal action of complement and possess fibronectin receptors for the surface of the fibrin-platelet thrombus. Among the many other characteristics of IE-producing bacteria demonstrated in vitro and in vivo, some features include the following:
- Increased adherence to aortic valve leaflet disks by enterococci, S viridans, and S aureus
- Mucoid-producing strains of S aureus
- Dextran-producing strains of S viridans
- S viridans and enterococci that possess FimA surface adhesin
- Platelet aggregation by S aureus and S viridans and resistance of S aureus to platelet microbicidal proteins
The pathogenesis of pacemaker IE is similar. Shortly after implantation, the development of a fibrin-platelet thrombus (similar to the nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis described above) involves the generator box and conducting leads. After 1 week, the connective tissue proliferates, partially embedding the leads in the wall of the vein and endocardium. This layer may offer partial protection against infection during a bacteremia.
Bacteremia (either spontaneous or due to an invasive procedure) infects the sterile fibrin-platelet vegetation described above. BSIs develop from various extracardiac types of infection, such as pneumonias or pyelonephritis, but most commonly from gingival disease. Of those with high-grade gingivitis, 10% have recurrent transient bacteremias (usually streptococcal species). Most cases of subacute disease are secondary to the bacteremias that develop from the activities of daily living (eg, brushing teeth, bowel movements).
Bacteremia can result from various invasive procedures, ranging from oral surgery to sclerotherapy of esophageal varices to genitourinary surgeries to various abdominal operations. The potential for invasive procedures to produce a bacteremia varies greatly. Procedures, rates, and organisms are as follows:
- Endoscopy - Rate of 0-20%; coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), streptococci, diphtheroids
- Colonoscopy - Rate of 0-20%; Escherichia coli, Bacteroides species
- Barium enema - Rate of 0-20%; enterococci, aerobic and anaerobic gram-negative rods
- Dental extractions - Rate of 40-100%; S viridans
- Transurethral resection of the prostate - Rate of 20-40%; coliforms, enterococci, S aureus
- Transesophageal echocardiography - Rate of 0-20%; S viridans, anaerobic organisms, streptococci
The incidence of nosocomial bacteremias, mostly associated with intravascular lines, has more than doubled in the last few years. Up to 90% of BSIs caused by these devices are secondary to the placement of various types of central venous catheters. Hickman and Broviac catheters are associated with the lowest rates, presumably because of their Dacron cuffs. Peripherally placed central venous catheters are associated with similar rates.
Intravascular catheters are infected from 1 of the following 4 sources:
- Infection of the insertion site
- Infection of the catheter
- Bacteremia arising from another site
- Contamination of the infused solution
Bacterial adherence to intravascular catheters depends on the response of the host to the presence of this foreign body, the properties of the organism itself, and the position of the catheter. Within a few days of insertion, a sleeve of fibrin and fibronectin is deposited on the catheter. S aureus adheres to the fibrin component.
S aureus also produces an infection of the endothelial cells (endotheliosis), which is important in producing the continuous bacteremia of S aureus BSIs. Endotheliosis may explain many cases of persistent methicillin-susceptible S aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) catheter-related BSIs without an identifiable cause.
S aureus catheter-related BSIs occur even after an infected catheter is removed, apparently attributable to specific virulence factors of certain strains of S aureus that invade the adjacent endothelial cells. At some point, the staphylococci re-enter the bloodstream, resulting in bacteremia.[12]
Four days after placement, the risk of infection markedly increases. Lines positioned in the internal jugular are more prone to infection than those placed in the subclavian vein. Colonization of the intracutaneous tract is the most likely source of short-term catheter-related BSIs. Among lines in place for more than 2 weeks, infection of the hub is the major source of bacteremia. In some cases, the infusion itself may be a reservoir of infection.
Colonization of heart valves by microorganisms is a complex process. Most transient bacteremias are short-lived, are without consequence, and are often not preventable. Bacteria rarely adhere to an endocardial nidus before the microorganisms are removed from the circulation by various host defenses.
Once microorganisms do establish themselves on the surface of the vegetation, the process of platelet aggregation and fibrin deposition accelerate at the site. As the bacteria multiply, they are covered by ever-thickening layers of platelets and thrombin, which protect them from neutrophils and other host defenses. Organisms deep in the vegetation hibernate because of the paucity of available nutrients and are therefore less susceptible to bactericidal antimicrobials that interfere with bacterial cell wall synthesis.
Complications of subacute endocarditis result from embolization, slowly progressive valvular destruction, and various immunological mechanisms. The pathological picture of subacute IE is marked by valvular vegetations in which bacteria colonies are present both on and below the surface.
The cellular reaction in SBE is primarily that of mononuclear cells and lymphocytes, with few polymorphonuclear cells. The surface of the valve beneath the vegetation shows few organisms. Proliferation of capillaries and fibroblasts is marked. Areas of healing are scattered among areas of destruction. Over time, the healing process falls behind, and valvular insufficiency develops secondary to perforation of the cusps and damage to the chordae tendineae. Compared with acute disease, little extension of the infectious process occurs beyond the valvular leaflets.
Levels of agglutinating and complement-fixing bactericidal antibodies and cryoglobulins are markedly increased in patients with subacute endocarditis. Many of the extracardiac manifestations of this form of the disease are due to circulating immune complexes. Among these include glomerulonephritis, peripheral manifestations (eg, Osler nodes, Roth spots, subungual hemorrhages), and, possibly, various musculoskeletal abnormalities. Janeway lesions usually arise from infected microemboli.
The microscopic appearance of acute bacterial endocarditis differs markedly from that of subacute disease. Vegetations that contain no fibroblasts develop rapidly, with no evidence of repair. Large amounts of both polymorphonuclear leukocytes and organisms are present in an ever-expanding area of necrosis. This process rapidly produces spontaneous rupture of the leaflets, of the papillary muscles, and of the chordae tendineae.
The complications of acute bacterial endocarditis result from intracardiac disease and metastatic infection produced by suppurative emboli. Because of their shortened course, immunological phenomena are not a part of acute IE.
Etiology
The different types of IE have varying causes and involve different pathogens.
Native valve endocarditis
The following are the main underlying causes of NVE:
- Rheumatic valvular disease (30% of NVE) - Primarily involves the mitral valve followed by the aortic valve
- Congenital heart disease (15% of NVE) - Underlying etiologies include a patent ductus arteriosus, ventricular septal defect, tetralogy of Fallot, or any native or surgical high-flow lesion.
- Mitral valve prolapse with an associated murmur (20% of NVE)
- Degenerative heart disease - Including calcific aortic stenosis due to a bicuspid valve, Marfan syndrome, or syphilitic disease
Approximately 70% of infections in NVE are caused by Streptococcus species, including S viridans, Streptococcus bovis, and enterococci. Staphylococcus species cause 25% of cases and generally demonstrate a more aggressive acute course (see the images below).
Prosthetic valve endocarditis
Early PVE, which presents shortly after surgery, has a different bacteriology and prognosis than late PVE, which presents in a subacute fashion similar to NVE.
Infection associated with aortic valve prostheses is particularly associated with local abscess and fistula formation, and valvular dehiscence. This may lead to shock, heart failure, heart block, shunting of blood to the right atrium, pericardial tamponade, and peripheral emboli to the central nervous system and elsewhere.
Early PVE may be caused by a variety of pathogens, including S aureus and S epidermidis. These nosocomially acquired organisms are often methicillin-resistant (eg, MRSA).[13] Late disease is most commonly caused by streptococci. Overall, CoNS are the most frequent cause of PVE (30%).
S aureus causes 17% of early PVE and 12% of late PVE. Corynebacterium, nonenterococcal streptococci, fungi (eg, C albicans, Candida stellatoidea, Aspergillus species), Legionella, and the HACEK (ie, Haemophilus aphrophilus, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella corrodens, Kingella kingae) organisms cause the remaining cases.
IVDA infective endocarditis
Diagnosis of endocarditis in IV drug users can be difficult and requires a high index of suspicion. Two thirds of patients have no previous history of heart disease or murmur on admission. A murmur may be absent in those with tricuspid disease, owing to the relatively small pressure gradient across this valve. Pulmonary manifestations may be prominent in patients with tricuspid infection: one third have pleuritic chest pain, and three quarters demonstrate chest radiographic abnormalities.
S aureus is the most common (< 50% of cases) etiologic organism in patients with IVDA IE. MRSA accounts for an increasing portion of S aureus infections and has been associated with previous hospitalizations, long-term addiction, and nonprescribed antibiotic use. Groups A, C, and G streptococci and enterococci are also recovered from patients with IVDA IE.
Currently, gram-negative organisms are involved infrequently. P aeruginosa[14] and the HACEK family are the most common examples.
Nosocomial/healthcare-associated infective endocarditis
Endocarditis may be associated with new therapeutic modalities involving intravascular devices such as central or peripheral intravenous catheters, rhythm control devices such as pacemakers and defibrillators, hemodialysis shunts and catheters, and chemotherapeutic and hyperalimentation lines.[15] These patients tend to have significant comorbidities, more advanced age, and predominant infection with S aureus. The mortality rate is high in this group.
The organisms that cause NIE/HCIE obviously are related to the type of underlying bacteremia. The gram-positive cocci (ie, S aureus, CoNS, enterococci, nonenterococcal streptococci) are the most common pathogens.
Fungal endocarditis
Fungal endocarditis is found in intravenous drug users and intensive care unit patients who receive broad-spectrum antibiotics.[16] Blood cultures are often negative, and diagnosis frequently is made after microscopic examination of large emboli.
Clinical features associated with different pathogens
Different causative organisms tend to give rise to varying clinical manifestations of IE, as shown in the Table below.
Table 1. Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis According to Causative Organism (Open Table in a new window)
Causative Organism(s) | Clinical Features of IE |
Staphylococcus aureus |
|
Streptococcus viridans |
|
Streptococcus intermedius group |
|
Abiotrophia |
|
Group D streptococci |
|
Nonenterococcal group D |
|
Group B streptococci |
|
Group A, C, and G streptococci |
|
Coagulase-negative S aureus |
|
Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
|
HACEK (ie, Haemophilus aphrophilus, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella corrodens, Kingella kingae) |
|
Fungal |
|
Bartonella |
|
Multiple pathogens (polymicrobial) |
|
Risk factors
The most significant risk factor for IE is residual valvular damage caused by a previous attack of endocarditis.[19, 15]
Many possible risk factors for the development of pacemaker IE have been described, including diabetes mellitus, age, and use of anticoagulants and corticosteroids. The evidence for these is conflicting. The major risk factor is probably surgical intervention to any part of the pacemaker system, especially elective battery replacements. The rate of infection associated with battery replacements is approximately 5 times that of the initial implantation (6.5% vs 1.4%).
Other significant risk factors for pacemaker IE include the development of a postoperative hematoma, the inexperience of the surgeon, and a preceding temporary transvenous pacing.
Epidemiology
In the United States, the incidence of IE is approximately 2-4 cases per 100,000 persons per year. This rate has not changed in the past 50 years.[20] The incidence of IE in other countries is similar to that in the United States.
Although endocarditis can occur in a person of any age, the mean age of patients has gradually risen over the past 50 years. Currently, more than 50% of patients are older than 50 years.[15] Mendiratta et al, in their retrospective study of hospital discharges from 1993-2003 of patients aged 65 years and older with a primary or secondary diagnosis of IE, found that hospitalizations for IE increased 26%, from 3.19 per 10,000 elderly patients in 1993 to 3.95 per 10,000 in 2003.[21]
IE is 3 times as common in males as in females. It has no racial predilection.
Prognosis
Prognosis largely depends on whether or not complications develop. If left untreated, IE is generally fatal. Early detection and appropriate treatment of this uncommon disease can be lifesaving.
Cure rates for appropriately managed (including both medical and surgical therapies) NVE are as follows:
- For S viridans and S bovis infection, the rate is 98%.
- For enterococci and S aureus infection in individuals who abuse intravenous drugs, the rate is 90%.
- For community-acquired S aureus infection in individuals who do not abuse intravenous drugs, the rate is 60-70%.
- For infection with aerobic gram-negative organisms, the rate is 40-60%.
- For infection with fungal organisms, the rate is lower than 50%.
For PVE, the cure rates are as follows:
- Rates are 10-15% lower for each of the above categories, for both early and late PVE.
- Surgery is required far more frequently.
- Approximately 60% of early CoNS PVE cases and 70% of late CoNS PVE cases are curable.
Anecdotal reports describe the resolution of right-sided valvular infection caused by S aureus infection in individuals who abuse intravenous drugs after just a few days of oral antibiotics.
The role of valvular surgery in reducing mortality among patients with IE has been unclear. Challenges to resolving this question include the necessity of performing multicentered studies with an apparent difficulty of ensuring that the patients' preoperative assessments and surgical approaches are comparable. The largest study to date indicates that in cases of IE complicated by heart failure, valvular surgery reduces the 1-year mortality rate.[84]
Mortality rates in NVE range from 16-27%. Mortality rates in patients with PVE are higher. More than 50% of these infections occur within 2 months after surgery. The fatality rate of pacemaker IE ranges up to 34%.[22]
Increased mortality rates are associated with increased age,[23] infection involving the aortic valve, development of congestive heart failure, central nervous system (CNS) complications, and underlying disease such as diabetes mellitus. Catastrophic neurological events of all types due to IE are highly predictive of morbidity and mortality.[24]
Mortality rates also vary with the infecting organism. Acute endocarditis due to S aureus is associated with a high mortality rate (30-40%), except when it is associated with IV drug use.[10, 25] Endocarditis due to streptococci has a mortality rate of approximately 10%.
Patient Education
Surveys indicate that an appallingly small number of patients who are at risk for developing IE have an understanding of antibiotic and nonpharmacologic (ie, appropriate oral hygiene) principles. Drug rehabilitation for patients who use IV drugs is critical.
The United Kingdom's National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) addresses patient education in its 2008 guideline on prophylaxis against IE in adults and children undergoing interventional procedures. The NICE's guideline recommends that health care professionals teach patients about the symptoms of IE and the risks of nonmedical invasive procedures such as body piercing and tattooing, explain the benefits and risks of antibiotic prophylaxis and the reasons that it is no longer routine, and emphasize the need to maintain good oral health.[26]
For patient education information, see the Heart Center, as well as Tetralogy of Fallot.
-
Brusch JL. Infective endocarditis and its mimics in the critical care unit. In: Cunha BA, ed. Infectious Diseases in Critical Care. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Informa Healthcare; 2007:261-2.
-
Karchmer AW. Infective endocarditis. In: Braunwald's Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 7th ed. WB Saunders Co; 2005:1633-1658.
-
Karchmer AW. Infective endocarditis. In: Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. 16th ed. McGraw-Hill; 2005:731-40.
-
Lerner PI, Weinstein L. Infective endocarditis in the antibiotic era. N Engl J Med. Feb 17 1966;274(7):388-93 concl. [Medline].
-
Lerner PI, Weinstein L. Infective endocarditis in the antibiotic era. N Engl J Med. Feb 3 1966;274(5):259-66 contd. [Medline].
-
Lerner PI, Weinstein L. Infective endocarditis in the antibiotic era. N Engl J Med. Jan 27 1966;274(4):199-206 contd. [Medline].
-
Brusch J. Infective Endocarditis: Management in the Era of Intravascular Devices. New York, NY: Informa Healthcare; 2007.
-
Baddour LM, Wilson LM. Infections of prosthetic valves and other cardiovascular devices: intravascular devices. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, eds. Mandel, Douglas and Bennett's Principles and Practice and Infectious Diseases. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Elsevier; 2005:1022-44.
-
Weinstein LW, Brusch JL. Infective Endocarditis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996.
-
Wang A, Athan E, Pappas PA, Fowler VG Jr, Olaison L, Paré C, et al. Contemporary clinical profile and outcome of prosthetic valve endocarditis. JAMA. Mar 28 2007;297(12):1354-61. [Medline].
-
Miró JM, del Río A, Mestres CA. Infective endocarditis in intravenous drug abusers and HIV-1 infected patients. Infect Dis Clin North Am. Jun 2002;16(2):273-95, vii-viii. [Medline].
-
Xiong YQ, Fowler VG, Yeaman MR, Perdreau-Remington F, Kreiswirth BN, Bayer AS. Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in vitro and in an experimental endocarditis model. J Infect Dis. Jan 15 2009;199(2):201-8. [Medline]. [Full Text].
-
Chu VH, Miro JM, Hoen B, Cabell CH, Pappas PA, Jones P, et al. Coagulase-negative staphylococcal prosthetic valve endocarditis--a contemporary update based on the International Collaboration on Endocarditis: prospective cohort study. Heart. Apr 2009;95(7):570-6. [Medline].
-
Reyes MP, Ali A, Mendes RE, Biedenbach DJ. Resurgence of Pseudomonas endocarditis in Detroit, 2006-2008. Medicine (Baltimore). Sep 2009;88(5):294-301. [Medline].
-
Murdoch DR, Corey GR, Hoen B, Miró JM, Fowler VG Jr, Bayer AS, et al. Clinical presentation, etiology, and outcome of infective endocarditis in the 21st century: the International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study. Arch Intern Med. Mar 9 2009;169(5):463-73. [Medline].
-
Baddley JW, Benjamin DK Jr, Patel M, Miró J, Athan E, Barsic B, et al. Candida infective endocarditis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. Jul 2008;27(7):519-29. [Medline]. [Full Text].
-
Chu VH, Woods CW, Miro JM, Hoen B, Cabell CH, Pappas PA, et al. Emergence of coagulase-negative staphylococci as a cause of native valve endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis. Jan 15 2008;46(2):232-42. [Medline].
-
Hill EE, Herijgers P, Claus P, Vanderschueren S, Herregods MC, Peetermans WE. Infective endocarditis: changing epidemiology and predictors of 6-month mortality: a prospective cohort study. Eur Heart J. Jan 2007;28(2):196-203. [Medline].
-
Mylonakis E, Calderwood SB. Infective endocarditis in adults. N Engl J Med. Nov 1 2001;345(18):1318-30. [Medline].
-
Tleyjeh IM, Steckelberg JM, Murad HS, Anavekar NS, Ghomrawi HM, Mirzoyev Z, et al. Temporal trends in infective endocarditis: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. JAMA. Jun 22 2005;293(24):3022-8. [Medline].
-
Mendiratta P, Tilford JM, Prodhan P, Cleves MA, Wei JY. Trends in hospital discharge disposition for elderly patients with infective endocarditis: 1993 to 2003. J Am Geriatr Soc. May 2009;57(5):877-81. [Medline].
-
Wallace SM, Walton BI, Kharbanda RK, Hardy R, Wilson AP, Swanton RH. Mortality from infective endocarditis: clinical predictors of outcome. Heart. Jul 2002;88(1):53-60. [Medline]. [Full Text].
-
Durante-Mangoni E, Bradley S, Selton-Suty C, Tripodi MF, Barsic B, Bouza E, et al. Current features of infective endocarditis in elderly patients: results of the International Collaboration on Endocarditis Prospective Cohort Study. Arch Intern Med. Oct 27 2008;168(19):2095-103. [Medline].
-
Sonneville R, Mirabel M, Hajage D, et al. Neurologic complications and outcomes of infective endocarditis in critically ill patients: The ENDOcardite en REAnimation prospective multicenter study. Crit Care Med. Jun 2011;39(6):1474-1481. [Medline].
-
Chu VH, Cabell CH, Benjamin DK Jr, Kuniholm EF, Fowler VG Jr, Engemann J, et al. Early predictors of in-hospital death in infective endocarditis. Circulation. Apr 13 2004;109(14):1745-9. [Medline].
-
[Guideline] National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Prophylaxis against infective endocarditis. Antimicrobial prophylaxis against infective endocarditis in adults and children undergoing interventional procedures. 2008. (NICE clinical guideline No. 64).
-
[Guideline] Baddour LM, Epstein AE, Erickson CC, et al. Update on cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections and their management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. Jan 26 2010;121(3):458-77. [Medline].
-
Epaulard O, Roch N, Potton L, Pavese P, Brion JP, Stahl JP. Infective endocarditis-related stroke: diagnostic delay and prognostic factors. Scand J Infect Dis. 2009;41(8):558-62. [Medline].
-
Crawford MH, Durack DT. Clinical presentation of infective endocarditis. Cardiol Clin. May 2003;21(2):159-66, v. [Medline].
-
Di Salvo G, Habib G, Pergola V, Avierinos JF, Philip E, Casalta JP, et al. Echocardiography predicts embolic events in infective endocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol. Mar 15 2001;37(4):1069-76. [Medline].
-
Eknoyan G, Lister BJ, Kim HS, Greenberg SD. Renal complications of bacterial endocarditis. Am J Nephrol. 1985;5(6):457-69. [Medline].
-
Pruitt AA, Rubin RH, Karchmer AW, Duncan GW. Neurologic complications of bacterial endocarditis. Medicine (Baltimore). Jul 1978;57(4):329-43. [Medline].
-
[Guideline] Sexton DJ, Spelman D. Current best practices and guidelines. Assessment and management of complications in infective endocarditis. Cardiol Clin. May 2003;21(2):273-82, vii-viii. [Medline].
-
Snygg-Martin U, Gustafsson L, Rosengren L, Alsiö A, Ackerholm P, Andersson R, et al. Cerebrovascular complications in patients with left-sided infective endocarditis are common: a prospective study using magnetic resonance imaging and neurochemical brain damage markers. Clin Infect Dis. Jul 1 2008;47(1):23-30. [Medline].
-
Terpenning MS, Buggy BP, Kauffman CA. Infective endocarditis: clinical features in young and elderly patients. Am J Med. Oct 1987;83(4):626-34. [Medline].
-
Bansal RC. Infective endocarditis. Med Clin North Am. Sep 1995;79(5):1205-40. [Medline].
-
Conlon PJ, Jefferies F, Krigman HR, Corey GR, Sexton DJ, Abramson MA. Predictors of prognosis and risk of acute renal failure in bacterial endocarditis. Clin Nephrol. Feb 1998;49(2):96-101. [Medline].
-
Cosmi JE, Tunick PA, Kronzon I. Mortality in patients with paravalvular abscess diagnosed by transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. Jul 2004;17(7):766-8. [Medline].
-
Cunha BA, Gill MV, Lazar JM. Acute infective endocarditis. Diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Infect Dis Clin North Am. Dec 1996;10(4):811-34. [Medline].
-
Fowler VG Jr, Scheld WM, Bayer AS. Endocarditis and intravascular infections. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JA, Dolin R, eds. Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 6th ed. Philadelphia, Penn: Elseiver; 2005:975-1021.
-
Roberts NK, Somerville J. Pathological significance of electrocardiographic changes in aortic valve endocarditis. Br Heart J. May 1969;31(3):395-6. [Medline].
-
Robinson SL, Saxe JM, Lucas CE, Arbulu A, Ledgerwood AM, Lucas WF. Splenic abscess associated with endocarditis. Surgery. Oct 1992;112(4):781-6; discussion 786-7. [Medline].
-
Weinstein L. Life-threatening complications of infective endocarditis and their management. Arch Intern Med. May 1986;146(5):953-7. [Medline].
-
Weinstein L, Schlesinger JJ. Pathoanatomic, pathophysiologic and clinical correlations in endocarditis (first of two parts). N Engl J Med. Oct 17 1974;291(16):832-7. [Medline].
-
Wang CC, Lee CH, Chan CY, Chen HW. Splenic infarction and abscess complicating infective endocarditis. Am J Emerg Med. Oct 2009;27(8):1021.e3-5. [Medline].
-
Kradin RL. Pathology of infective endocarditis. In: Brusch JL, ed. Infective Endocarditis: Management in the Era of Intravascular Devices. New York, NY: Informa Healthcare; 2007:101-18.
-
Brusch JL. Pathoanatomical, pathophysiological and clinical correlations. In: Brusch JL, ed. Infective Endocarditis: Management in the Era of Intravascular Devices. New York, NY: Informa Healthcare; 2007:119-41.
-
Durack DT, Lukes AS, Bright DK. New criteria for diagnosis of infective endocarditis: utilization of specific echocardiographic findings. Duke Endocarditis Service. Am J Med. Mar 1994;96(3):200-9. [Medline].
-
[Guideline] Towns ML, Reller LB. Diagnostic methods current best practices and guidelines for isolation of bacteria and fungi in infective endocarditis. Infect Dis Clin North Am. Jun 2002;16(2):363-76, ix-x. [Medline].
-
Archibald LK, Pallangyo K, Kazembe P, Reller LB. Blood culture contamination in Tanzania, Malawi, and the United States: a microbiological tale of three cities. J Clin Microbiol. Dec 2006;44(12):4425-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].
-
Bates DW, Goldman L, Lee TH. Contaminant blood cultures and resource utilization. The true consequences of false-positive results. JAMA. Jan 16 1991;265(3):365-9. [Medline].
-
Khatib R, Riederer K, Saeed S, Johnson LB, Fakih MG, Sharma M, et al. Time to positivity in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: possible correlation with the source and outcome of infection. Clin Infect Dis. Sep 1 2005;41(5):594-8. [Medline].
-
Lee A, Mirrett S, Reller LB, Weinstein MP. Detection of bloodstream infections in adults: how many blood cultures are needed?. J Clin Microbiol. Nov 2007;45(11):3546-8. [Medline]. [Full Text].
-
[Guideline] Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E, Craven DE, Flynn P, O'Grady NP, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. Jul 1 2009;49(1):1-45. [Medline].
-
Weinbaum FI, Lavie S, Danek M, Sixsmith D, Heinrich GF, Mills SS. Doing it right the first time: quality improvement and the contaminant blood culture. J Clin Microbiol. Mar 1997;35(3):563-5. [Medline]. [Full Text].
-
Weinstein MP. Blood culture contamination: persisting problems and partial progress. J Clin Microbiol. Jun 2003;41(6):2275-8. [Medline]. [Full Text].
-
Casella F, Rana B, Casazza G, Bhan A, Kapetanakis S, Omigie J, et al. The potential impact of contemporary transthoracic echocardiography on the management of patients with native valve endocarditis: a comparison with transesophageal echocardiography. Echocardiography. Sep 2009;26(8):900-6. [Medline].
-
Choussat R, Thomas D, Isnard R, Michel PL, Iung B, Hanania G, et al. Perivalvular abscesses associated with endocarditis; clinical features and prognostic factors of overall survival in a series of 233 cases. Perivalvular Abscesses French Multicentre Study. Eur Heart J. Feb 1999;20(3):232-41. [Medline].
-
[Guideline] Cheitlin MD, Armstrong WF, Aurigemma GP, Beller GA, Bierman FZ, Davis JL, et al. ACC/AHA/ASE 2003 guideline update for the clinical application of echocardiography: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASE Committee to Update the 1997 Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography). Circulation. Sep 2 2003;108(9):1146-62. [Medline].
-
Jassal DS, Picard MH. Echocardiography. In: Brusch JL, ed. Infective Endocarditis: Management in the Era of Intravascular Devices. New York, NY: Informa Healthcare; 2007:255-72.
-
Roe MT, Abramson MA, Li J, Heinle SK, Kisslo J, Corey GR, et al. Clinical information determines the impact of transesophageal echocardiography on the diagnosis of infective endocarditis by the duke criteria. Am Heart J. Jun 2000;139(6):945-51. [Medline].
-
Feuchtner GM, Stolzmann P, Dichtl W, Schertler T, Bonatti J, Scheffel H, et al. Multislice computed tomography in infective endocarditis: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography and intraoperative findings. J Am Coll Cardiol. Feb 3 2009;53(5):436-44. [Medline].
-
Fowler VG Jr, Boucher HW, Corey GR, Abrutyn E, Karchmer AW, Rupp ME, et al. Daptomycin versus standard therapy for bacteremia and endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus. N Engl J Med. Aug 17 2006;355(7):653-65. [Medline].
-
Baddour LM, Wilson WR, Bayer AS, Fowler VG Jr, Bolger AF, Levison ME, et al. Infective endocarditis: diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of complications: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology, Stroke, and Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, American Heart Association: endorsed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Circulation. Jun 14 2005;111(23):e394-434. [Medline].
-
Buckholz K, Larsen CT. Severity of gentamicin is nephrotoxic effect on patients with infective endocarditis: a prospective observation of cohort study of 373 patients. Clinical Infect Dis. 2009;48:65-71.
-
Cunha BA. Persistent S. aureus acute bacteremia: clinical pathway for diagnosis and treatment. Antibiot for Clin. 2006;10:39-46.
-
Falagas ME, Manta KG, Ntziora F, Vardakas KZ. Linezolid for the treatment of patients with endocarditis: a systematic review of the published evidence. J Antimicrob Chemother. Aug 2006;58(2):273-80. [Medline].
-
Jones T, Yeaman MR, Sakoulas G, Yang SJ, Proctor RA, Sahl HG, et al. Failures in clinical treatment of Staphylococcus aureus Infection with daptomycin are associated with alterations in surface charge, membrane phospholipid asymmetry, and drug binding. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Jan 2008;52(1):269-78. [Medline]. [Full Text].
-
Sakoulas G, Moise-Broder PA, Schentag J, Forrest A, Moellering RC Jr, Eliopoulos GM. Relationship of MIC and bactericidal activity to efficacy of vancomycin for treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol. Jun 2004;42(6):2398-402. [Medline]. [Full Text].
-
Fowler VG Jr, Li J, Corey GR, Boley J, Marr KA, Gopal AK, et al. Role of echocardiography in evaluation of patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: experience in 103 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. Oct 1997;30(4):1072-8. [Medline].
-
Fowler VG Jr, Miro JM, Hoen B, Cabell CH, Abrutyn E, Rubinstein E, et al. Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis: a consequence of medical progress. JAMA. Jun 22 2005;293(24):3012-21. [Medline].
-
Khatib R, Johnson LB, Fakih MG, Riederer K, Khosrovaneh A, Shamse Tabriz M, et al. Persistence in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: incidence, characteristics of patients and outcome. Scand J Infect Dis. 2006;38(1):7-14. [Medline].
-
Duval X, Selton-Suty C, Alla F, Salvador-Mazenq M, Bernard Y, Weber M, et al. Endocarditis in patients with a permanent pacemaker: a 1-year epidemiological survey on infective endocarditis due to valvular and/or pacemaker infection. Clin Infect Dis. Jul 1 2004;39(1):68-74. [Medline].
-
[Guideline] Olaison L, Pettersson G. Current best practices and guidelines indications for surgical intervention in infective endocarditis. Infect Dis Clin North Am. Jun 2002;16(2):453-75, xi. [Medline].
-
Mekontso Dessap A, Zahar JR, Voiriot G, Ali F, Aissa N, Kirsch M, et al. Influence of preoperative antibiotherapy on valve culture results and outcome of endocarditis requiring surgery. J Infect. Jul 2009;59(1):42-8. [Medline].
-
[Guideline] Wilson W, Taubert KA, Gewitz M, Lockhart PB, Baddour LM, Levison M, et al. Prevention of infective endocarditis: guidelines from the American Heart Association: a guideline from the American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. Circulation. Oct 9 2007;116(15):1736-54. [Medline].
-
Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, Sinopoli D, Chu H, Cosgrove S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med. Dec 28 2006;355(26):2725-32. [Medline].
-
Dajani AS, Taubert KA, Wilson W, Bolger AF, Bayer A, Ferrieri P, et al. Prevention of bacterial endocarditis. Recommendations by the American Heart Association. JAMA. Jun 11 1997;277(22):1794-801. [Medline].
-
Bach DS. Perspectives on the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for the prevention of infective endocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol. May 19 2009;53(20):1852-4. [Medline].
-
Thornhill MH, Dayer MJ, Forde JM, et al. Impact of the NICE guideline recommending cessation of antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of infective endocarditis: before and after study. BMJ. May 3 2011;342:d2392. [Medline]. [Full Text].
-
Nishimura RA, Carabello BA, Faxon DP, Freed MD, Lytle BW, O'Gara PT, et al. ACC/AHA 2008 guideline update on valvular heart disease: focused update on infective endocarditis: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. Aug 2008;118(8):887-96.
-
Netzer RO, Altwegg SC, Zollinger E, Täuber M, Carrel T, Seiler C. Infective endocarditis: determinants of long term outcome. Heart. Jul 2002;88(1):61-6. [Medline]. [Full Text].
-
US Food and Drug Administration. FDA Drug Safety Communication: Serious CNS reactions possible when linezolid (Zyvox®) is given to patients taking certain psychiatric medications. Available at http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm265305.htm. Accessed July 27, 2011.
-
Kiefer T, Park L, Tribouilloy C, Cortes C, Casillo R, Chu V, et al. Association between valvular surgery and mortality among patients with infective endocarditis complicated by heart failure. JAMA. Nov 23 2011;306(20):2239-47. [Medline].
Causative Organism(s) | Clinical Features of IE |
Staphylococcus aureus |
|
Streptococcus viridans |
|
Streptococcus intermedius group |
|
Abiotrophia |
|
Group D streptococci |
|
Nonenterococcal group D |
|
Group B streptococci |
|
Group A, C, and G streptococci |
|
Coagulase-negative S aureus |
|
Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
|
HACEK (ie, Haemophilus aphrophilus, Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella corrodens, Kingella kingae) |
|
Fungal |
|
Bartonella |
|
Multiple pathogens (polymicrobial) |
|
SERVICIOS DE FINANCIACIÓN LE-MERIDIAN. la compañía de préstamos que me otorgó un préstamo de 5,000,000.00 USD Cuando otros inversionistas de préstamos han descuidado mi oferta, pero Le_Meridian Funding Service me otorgó un préstamo exitoso. Están directamente en el financiamiento de préstamos y proyectos en términos de inversión. Proporcionan soluciones de financiamiento a empresas y personas que buscan acceso a fondos de los mercados de capitales, pueden ayudarlo a financiar su proyecto o expandir su negocio. en 1- (989-394-3740)
ResponderEliminar